The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE, uncontested after several weeks. – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 03:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Victoria Elizabeth

Victoria Elizabeth (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable. Owen ( talk) 05:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 07:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete Not notable - none of the reliable sources in the article even mention the subject of the article, not even a passing mention - there's just nothing. Exemplo347 ( talk) 07:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.