The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Vic Micolucci

Vic Micolucci (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

self-written page for nonentity Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete as a clear business listing and delete is always the solution should we want to save WP from advertising. SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete and close the afd. While I can't make head or tail of what Swister has written above, what I could find are primary sources, reporting from the subject and Facebook posts, which are available in plenty, but don't qualify as RS. Lourdes 08:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.