The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable film, no independent secondary coverage, per
WP:NFBOVINEBOY2008 10:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Appears to pass
WP:NFP with plenty of coverage by reliable, third-party independent sources, such as The Hindu[1],
[2],
[3] and Times of India[4],
[5], etc. —
O Fortuna velut luna 11:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton |
Talk 02:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.