The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable. We have
clear and strict notability requirements for porn performers, with three specific criteria; this person does not meet any of the three. Note: this is an area of Wikipedia that I have no interest in and have managed to avoid until now – so please excuse any mistake or misunderstanding, and forgive me for having skipped
WP:BEFORE on this particular occasion.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk) 19:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Clearly a notable porn actress.
Makro (
talk) 20:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Subject fails
WP:PORNSTAR,
WP:GNG, and
WP:ANYBIO. There's more coverage of her online (pun intended) but it's brief mentions (another pun) so I don't see general notability. Chris Troutman (
talk) 20:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - I presume L.A. Weekly is the only one valid reference.
Guilherme Burn (
talk) 00:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment The first item in
WP:PORNBIO is awards and the article links to a source (not necessarily an
WP:RS) that notes a bunch of awards. Do any of these count toward item 1.-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
@
TonyTheTiger: No, and the reason is that none of those awards which this person actually won are well-known and significant. Many of them are also for scenes, which don't apply. The AVNs are important, but this person never actually won any of them (just was nominated). —
Compassionate727(
T·
C) 12:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete total failure of both the GNG and the guidelines for performers in pornographic productions.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 06:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete handwaves towards notability does not actually equal evidence of reliable sourcing to meet GNG or even the discredited and overly generous PORNBIO.
SpartazHumbug! 09:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence of notability. Clearly, Boobpedia.com is not a reliable source.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 18:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –
Davey2010Talk 18:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.