The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A very long article sourced entirely from the content of the books it references. In many cases the wiki-links in the article are themselves recursive. This is
WP:OR at its best or worst. There are already articles about the individual books and the author and this is just a (very extended) synthesis derived from the content of those books. Fails
WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 14:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak support: It is certainly discouraging that the article's been tagged since 2010 and very little seems to have changed to satisfy concerns about the subject as being notable in its own right. I'm forced to agree with the nominator that it presently appears better suited to a wikia than to its own article here.
DonIago (
talk) 14:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(
talk page) 16:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.