- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Vance Syphers
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vance Syphers ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My search didn't find significant independent coverage of him. I did come across some articles written by him, but not about him. I don't see that the GNG is met. Article was written by an SPA who likely had a COI. Sandals1 ( talk) 21:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sandals1 ( talk) 21:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing present to suggest meeting WP:GNG. Sure, this person has a web footprint, but that's not sufficient. Being an executive producer of two minor films isn't sufficient notability either. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 15:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - the three references in the article are dead links (and they seemed to be articles authored by Syphers), otherwise the article is completely unsourced - couldn't find anything to establish notability - the article was created by a single purpose account, User:Wpgnc, or Wealth Preservation Group, so there may be WP:COI issues - Epinoia ( talk) 16:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.