The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)reply
No evidence for notability -- the articles are not about the firm, but about various projects in which it has been engaged. DGG (
talk ) 03:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete all of the mentions in the press seem to be stories about other companies that have engaged them.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 12:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete -- corporate spam on a non notable marketing agency. Sources are insufficient to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 20:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.