- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Femke ( talk) 18:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
V. K. Garg
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- V. K. Garg ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Among his most prominent work listed in the article is this [1] it has only 5 citations in 7 years. Fails WP:NPROF KSAWikipedian ( talk) 15:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 15:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: [2] Total 16,000 cites, h-index 68. Curbon7 ( talk) 16:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep he is notable academic and has 16,000 cites as mentioned above. I love to be honest ( talk) 06:22, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep seems to meet WP:NPROF due to the citation counts, unclear how the nom came to the conclusion that was there most prominent work. WP:NEXIST matters, not just what is shown on the article right now. WP:DINC - Kj cheetham ( talk) 21:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.