- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 02:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Urban Artist Soap
- Urban Artist Soap ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- BLP with non-RS. sourcing issues fails WP:ARTIST. Adding lots of non-RS just highlights WP:TOOSOON
- Second concern from contested PROD "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement." Widefox; talk 19:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete the article Street art doesn't have any information on Polish street art ( which is easy to find, a quick search brought up stories from Business Insider and CNN on the street art scene ) my recommendation is to delete this article, and put any wikiworthy information into the street art article, if enough builds up, spin out Street art in Poland and if that gets so crowded that we need a article just for soap. let's make it happen, as is I don't see any notability for this particular article ( couldn't find any 3rd party refs in a search ) and the wikilandscape doesn't support the idea either. Bryce Carmony ( talk) 11:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 17:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 17:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:TOOSOON here. Lots of the refs are blogspam-ish. Neutrality talk 16:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.