The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There is consensus that the subject does not appear notable at the moment. I see a very recent request for more time to work on this; it does not strike me as very reasonable to relist this for an indefinite amount of time when consensus has already formed, so I will instead delete, and provide a draftspace copy on request that can be worked on with no deadlines. Vanamonde (
Talk) 18:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
This article about Upendra Mahato is an advert and does not meet
WP:GNG. It lacks
WP:SIGCOV (indepth coverage)
Rath Butcher (
talk) 10:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete agree, non-notable. Socking is a concern.
Oaktree b (
talk) 17:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep If the article needs work, it needs work, but the person is notable. Usedtobecool☎️ 03:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable Nepalese. Just a rich man!
Hargovindkhurana (
talk) 05:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Article is obviously under attack. Usedtobecool☎️ 13:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I see no evidence of any attack.
Maproom (
talk) 06:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 18:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep As per Tulsi and Usedtobecool, Article is under attack and it is tagged by a sock. The nominator must be blocked immediately. This article is notable.
2405:204:331C:EC9:A54D:D25F:9580:E5A1 (
talk) 05:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC) —
2405:204:331C:EC9:A54D:D25F:9580:E5A1 (
talk·contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page.
Drm310🍁 (
talk) 16:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Little evidence that subject is notable.
Maproom (
talk) 06:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: The first AfD ended up as Keep because the nominator was confirmed as a sock. Rath Butcher, the nominator of this second AfD is suspected of being a sock of the same editor (see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nalbarian), but as of 18 August, evaluation in progress. Question is, does that "poison the well," given the weakness of references identified by Jéské Couriano?
David notMD (
talk) 10:47, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I will rewrite the article. Give me a couple of days, please. Usedtobecool☎️ 15:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.