The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Jayjg (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Article is unsourced, and consists largely of speculation.
RadManCF (
talk) 16:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete - I agree. Too speculative at this point; the info here is better suited for a fansite. DOOMSDAYER520 (
Talk|
Contribs) 16:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing but rumors and speculation. I don't think this supposed movie has even been confirmed (yet alone started pre-production already). TJSpyke 16:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete for all reasons stated above. Particularly the title which is both temporary in nature and unspecific, it could also be a comic project, an animated series, a game, etc. Anything can be an "untitled project".--
70.80.234.196 (
talk) 18:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete without prejudice toward recreation. The project is getting some "buzz"
[1][2][3][4][5][6]... but not quite enough in reliable sources to meet
WP:CRYSTAL. No need to SALT, as considering the money filmmakers have made on the sequels, it is more likley than not that the project will continue. Wikipedia can afford to be patient, and need not be bitey. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 00:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per 70.80.234.196 and
WP:HAMMER, projects are almost (but not quite) never notable before a working title is leaked to the press. If/when this is farther along an article will certainly be appropriate, but not now.
Eluchil404 (
talk) 08:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.