The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Concerns had been previously raised through a tag that notability of said subject is unclear as per
WP:SIGCOV. Relies on primary sources as of now. No multiple secondary sources to make a pass of
WP:SIGCOV. The Estonian version of said article isn't much of a help in verifying notability either.
nearlyevil665 06:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Nearlyevil665: rather speedy keep. Massive inbounding links, massive mentionings in web.
WP:SIGCOV per
[1],
[2] (whole book dedicated to this organization),
[3],
[4] --
Estopedist1 (
talk) 06:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 06:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. Organisations of this type are usually notable, and there are probably good enough coverage in Estonian sources.
Geschichte (
talk) 10:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. There are very good, independent, non-primary sources for the association.
Sirp has a very detailed history of the association.
Eesti Rahvusringhääling has a feature on Andro Mänd elected as the president of the organization.
The Museum of Estonian Architecture profiles the earliest members of the Union of Estonian Architects. There was a
book edited by
Krista Karu (EAL 1921-1996, published by Solnessi Arhitektuurikirjastus. ISBN: 9985902416) detailing the history of the organization published in 1999. There are countless articles (easily found) about the association giving awards. Articles about the anniversary of the founding
here, listings for projects and exhibits and competitions and awards
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, etc. There seems to be either some sort of bias or lackadaisical approach to some of these nominations.
WP:BEFORE would have been useful.
ExRat (
talk) 11:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.