The result was Delete. Icestorm815 • Talk 23:37, 25 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This topic is already described in Rationale for the Iraq War using reliable third-party publications. On the other hand, US government position on [the] invasion of Iraq is a poorly named soap-box for people to attack both the Bush administration and Democratic politicians who once believed Iraq retained extensive stockpiles of illicit weaponry. In addition, it cites self-published sources who claim Saddam Hussein trained the September 11 attackers. (e.g. HUSSEINANDTERROR.COM). I do not see the point in keeping this article when the other page describes the U.S. government position so much better. Dynablaster ( talk) 17:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply