- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
ULMA Construction
- ULMA Construction ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. I don't see any good references, GNews is full of PRWeb stuff, and one or two mentions in passing, nothing in Books. I'd have prodded it, but since it's a Spanish company, maybe some Spanish speaker can find some reliable Spanish coverage? For now, as I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this looks like a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - None of this currently suggests a better notable article and this current article looks more like their personal website, rather than a better encyclopedia article. There's nothing to suggest fully satisfying the applicable notability guidelines yet. SwisterTwister talk 08:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- delete looks suspiciously like an advertisement created by someone with a possible conflict of interest. LibStar ( talk) 15:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.