Fails
WP:MUSICBIO. No discography or chart activity, and no third-party independent coverage. Sources are all primary, consisting of promotional interviews, press releases, and subject's hometown publication (Ottawa Citizen).
💥Casualty• Hop along. •04:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: I created the article but I'll comment anyways. Meets
WP:BASIC. There are at least two in-depth Complex articles (
[1][2]) - Complex is a recommended source at
WP:A/S and is independent of the subject. There are many in-depth HipHopCanada articles (
[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]) which are independent of the subject. There are multiple in-depth HotNewHipHop sources (
[10][11][12][13][14] ) - HotNewHipHop is also a recommended source per
WP:A/S. This isn't including the many Ottawa Citizen articles which are all independent and reliable, or any of the interviews that add little additional commentary. Doesn't have to meet a SNG if it meets GNG/BASIC. I don't see how this is controversial. CFA💬21:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
A non-neutral tone is not a reason for deletion, though. It can be fixed through editing. I think it’s pretty clear the subject meets GNG, regardless of any SNGs that might apply. CFA💬10:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion by Clearfrienda that together shows significant coverage to pass
WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
22:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply