The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 23:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete: notability not established, does not appear to have won any awards or charted.
JamesBurns (
talk) 02:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs.
Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 04:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)reply
delete - no evidence of much at all--
Scott Mac (Doc) 01:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete No indication of notability, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources.
Duffbeerforme (
talk) 06:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.