The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete. --
MelanieN (
talk) 16:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Seems to be entirely "sourced" from his own websites tsemtulku.com and kechara.com. Lack of notability.
VictoriaGraysonTalk 21:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Struck duplicate !vote: your nomination is your !vote. Comment at will, though. Esquivaliencet 23:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete-using the
web of trust, it says that the websites are scams. Of course, it is user-generated, so don't blame me if I am wrong. Even if it is wrong, it is self-published.--ABCDEFAD✉ 22:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Tentative delete unless it can actually be improved and my searches found nothing explicitly good
here,
here and
here. I'm not an expert with the article's subject but I'm not seeing much improvement here.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, self-published, clear COI on page; this is entirely self-promotion of a non-notable individual
Ogresssmash! 08:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.