The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence that this meets
WP:NBUILD. That would "require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability". (
t ·
c) buidhe 09:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The church lacks any sources about it. Let alone multiple in-depth reliable ones. So, the article fails
WP:GNG and as such should be deleted. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 09:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.