The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Tryton

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst: spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst: canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst: csm|username}} or {{subst: csp|username}}.

Tryton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fork of a (recently deleted after repeat spamming) fork. The sources cited do not establish notability. They are not significant, reliable, independent coverage - the only one that even looks like it is actually just republishing a press release. Guy ( Help!) 12:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• As Tryton is used by GNU Health can we assume that notoriety sources for GNU Health can be used for it? eg: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950260/ or https://lwn.net/Articles/462600/ or https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/medical/news/gnu-health-wins-fsfs-project-social-benefit-award all those sources mention the link between the projects Nicoe ( talk) 09:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• I dont understand this deletion request at all...Tryton is a very active project and community, far away from the original TinyERP @JzG, can you explain your request more in detail? Coogor ( talk) 10:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• KEEP Wikipedia has a reputation for helping the world find things of value and provide some background and references to help to stimulate more inquiry. When it comes to ERP this project which has evolved into Oodo is an important application as it is an tested, effective open-source application that provides effective ERP services in other-wise over priced commercial. It is the ERP environment we use in our college management courses. The references and wikipedia entry provides an excellent starting point for potential students wanting to know about this software.

Rbatzing ( talk) 18:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep. A.s already stated, Tryton has a very active community [1] [2] [3], with approximately 250,000 SLOC [4] [5], it is quite a big software project, has been investigated e.g. by Fraunhofer [6], the University of Bern [7], featured in the Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences [8], has been reviewed by multiple independent sources e.g. [9] [10], has coverage on a popular development Q&A platform [11] and the Google search [12] returns more than 44,000 pages. Huskytreiber ( talk) 12:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep, enough references to reputable sources - in this field - are given, by now. -- Bernd.Brincken ( talk) 08:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep (of course!) My arguments:
  • The German magazine publishing house Heinz Heise, which is by far Germany's biggest technology magazine publishing house ( c't, iX, MIT Technology Review, Telepolis), states in c't (the computer magazine with the highest number of subscribers in Europe) Tryton to be among of the better known open source ERPs and took it into it's selection of totally 6 open source ERPs that it compares in a comparison essay. Further, Heise states that Tryton is doing very well in Germany in terms of a great active community that enforces localization of the ERP in Germany. http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Quelloffene-Kuer-Open-Source-ERP-Systeme-im-Vergleich-763963.html
  • The fact, that Tryton is the Framework for GNU Health, a world wide heavily used Health Center and medical practice software and an official GNU package, should alone be enough to make any "relevance doubts" sound absolutely silly!
  • Tryton is now even taught at Universities! Source: http://www.tryton.org/posts/fundacio-uab-students-to-use-tryton.html
  • Tryton has held multiple international conferences with many visitors (on site and via internet)
  • -- Tomakos ( talk) 16:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Notability requirements met by sources. ~ Kvng ( talk) 14:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply
• Can we close this awkward discussion now again please? 3 Weeks should be enough. -- 178.59.207.142 ( talk) 15:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.