The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. With the possibility for a mention in
Truthiness if relevant.
Sam Walton (
talk) 11:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)reply
nn neologism. Unless google censors its search results (or I am internets illiterate), there is virtually no hits last half year.
Staszek Lem (
talk) 04:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable neologism. We just had
Alternative facts which deals with similar issues
kept by AfD earlier today. I don't think a new article should be created every time someone thinks of a new term to describe issues concerning the Trump administration's relationship with truth. --
Metropolitan90(talk) 04:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
This sounds more like redirecting and merging than deleting, doesn't it? --
Matthiaspaul (
talk) 19:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)reply
A mention isn't the same as a merger. It doesn't seem notable enough for more than a single sentence, and anyone could add that to
Truthiness as long as it is referenced (if it isn't already there).
Jack N. Stock (
talk) 19:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. If it becomes genuinely widespread it'll be obvious enough. I favour 'Trumposity' myself.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 16:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
I changed my mind. A merge with
Truthiness would be better suited. It has just enough notability to be worth a small blurb within a parent article.
Andrew. Z. Colvin •
Talk 03:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)reply
delete a
Stephen Colbert gag that did not get ongoing attention. I searched before tagging it for notability.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 22:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect and merge into
Truthiness. Whilst not as well covered as
alternative facts (already), enough reliable sources can be found in international news outlets to establish notability. I therefore think we need an entry for this, but not necessarily in form of a separate article. I suggest to change this into a redirect and merge the contents into the related
Truthiness article. --
Matthiaspaul (
talk) 23:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per WTF —
JFGtalk 09:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)reply
We clearly have
WP:SNOW here, could someone do the honours and close it please.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 09:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.