- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Joe ( talk) 21:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Trilobites (article series)
- Trilobites (article series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references independent of The New York Times, and no clear redirect target where a mention of this series would be reasonable. (it would be undue in the main article on the paper) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 21:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. A non-notable blog/column. Doesn't appear to have won any awards or recognition (compare to Dot Earth), and written by a number of authors, precluding redirecting to a single person. No logical redirect target: if this column must be mentioned on Wikipedia, it should simply be briefly defined rather than linked, e.g. "...featured in the New York Times column 'Trilobites'..." --Animalparty! ( talk) 22:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! ( talk) 22:48, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! ( talk) 22:48, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, since practically nothing outside the subject's host newspaper can be found that mentions it. - The Gnome ( talk) 23:50, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.