The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Basically an advert, no assertion of notability, no verifiable sources.
Yerpo (
talk) 16:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete as not notable, not sourced and completely written as an advert without consideration for its relevance or place on wikipedia. (
Lil-unique1 (
talk) 16:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC))reply
I still think that this could be speedied, but I think that P.C. has a good point about userfying this.
Joe Chill (
talk) 22:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete G11. The article pretty much says it. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡
Hobbes 21:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Userfy. Close G11 candidate, but not exactly, correct to bring it to AfD. No salvable content. But there might correctly be a good article on the thing later. Treasure Island Indore - the winner of three most reputed awards in the country: "Best Designed Shopping Mall of India, 2007", by CNBC- Awaaz CRISIL Real Estate Awards, the "Most Admired Shopping Centre of India, 2008 - Tier-II Cities", by Images Shopping Centre Awards 2008 and the "Best Shopping Mall of the year Award 2008", by Franchise India 2008[1] (the 12th Google hit). Self-published and not exactly RS, but at least some strong claims to notability. Article was created yesterday, creator has only two edits. Cool down folks, per
WP:BITE, userfy with a nice comment. A little bit of
WP:BEFORE a sprinkle of
WP:AGF and we wouldnt need to see this at AfD
Power.corrupts (
talk) 22:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)reply
'Delete unless secondary sources that indicate notability are found before the AFD closes. Till date I have found only trivial mention in news sources.
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5] Unknown industry awards (that are often handed out by trade groups) that are mentioned only in the company press release are insufficient to establish notability under
WP:ORG.
Abecedare (
talk) 00:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.