The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No reliable coverage, and very, very spammy article.
Drmies (
talk) 02:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)reply
There are some decent claims to notability, but I don't think they quite add up.
Oiyarbepsy (
talk) 03:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)reply
What do you mean "They dont quite add up"? What links or facts do you find to be false? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Willpc17 (
talk •
contribs) 03:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)reply
I don't mean they are suspicious. I mean that the claims of notability literally don't add up to a notable subject. I'm not disputing the accuracy here.
Oiyarbepsy (
talk) 03:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)reply
So an artist that owns his own label and just so happen to be listed with the RIAA, Also being an MTV/VEVO artist and being able to Vote in the Grammys plus being on one of the biggest Spotify playlist isnt notable? Ive seen more mixtape and Youtube artist on here with less of a background then TooSmooth has and yet its taking a very long time for him to be apart of Wiki. Why is that?
Willpc17— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Willpc17 (
talk •
contribs) 05:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk) 08:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep The artist has strong credits and there backed up with links, Plus his business has also been credited. The RIAA Its self is a strong enough credit for any Record Label besides the work the label has done for its artist. A National Spotify Playlist Plus VEVO and MTV Features Are Just as Important Today In The Music Industry As Terrestrial Radio Airplay. Its a New Media Age, And This Article speaks on an artist Living in the Digital World! Speedy Keep— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Willpc17 (
talk •
contribs) 17:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. Of all the references listed in the article, the only
reliable, third party source that I see is
this article from the
Daily Herald (Arlington Heights), a local paper. In a search for sources, I could come up with little more than sites fueled by user-generated content. I am just not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject that is required by WP:GNG.
Apparition11Complaints/
Mistakes 22:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 16:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep If an artist thats only released Mix tapes and
Youtube videos can have a Wiki page, TooSmooth should be able to for the fact his apart of the RIAA a VEVO artist and has had videos on MTV— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Willpc17 (
talk •
contribs) 22:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Willpc17: Please stop !voting. You've already !voted twice, which is one time two many. !Voting three times won't affect the outcome though. if you want to add to your original !vote, then please do so, do not !vote again. !Voting more than once misleads users. --
AmaryllisGardenertalk 23:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Struck duplicate !votes above; only one is allowed. However, you can comment all you'd like.
NorthAmerica1000 16:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Best chance seems to be
WP:GNG. Ignoring all the sites selling music, the article doesn't offer much: a local paper's article
[1], and a biography that's on a site that also sells music and is still in beta (which is hardly independent or reliable). For a moment, I thought I had found an article on MTV
[2], but it turns out to be an area of the web site that is designed to be built and maintained by the artists themselves. --
Larry/Traveling_Man (
talk) 23:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.