From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 07:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Tony Granger

Tony Granger (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was actually going to speedy and/or PROD considering the current article's state and my searches only found unusable mentions for solid notability at News, Books and browsers but then I noticed the CLIO Award which is listed as one of the best awards for advertisers so here we are for better consensus and insight. Frankly, I still feel this is easily speedy material and is an example of WP:TNT at best. I also suggest looking at the history which has seemingly had several contributors since being started by Kylehoedl in May 2010. Notifying author Kylehoedl. SwisterTwister talk 20:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 ( T) 01:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 18:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.