The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 21:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)reply
If Linux Journal is considered reliable, then
[1] shows that Tong is verifiable, if not notable; in which case a redirect to something like the list at
Linux gaming might be in order.
Marasmusine (
talk) 17:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for finding that. However, it's only a very short mention (just over 100 words) in a longer article, so, as you say, it doesn't really confer notability. —
Psychonaut (
talk) 17:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete as nominator. No significant coverage has been found. —
Psychonaut (
talk) 20:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.