The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Tomb Raider (disambiguation)

Tomb Raider (disambiguation) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pointless disambiguation, as it mirrors all the entries on Tomb Raider's page. All there needs to be is a single hatnote, if anything. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 07:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete. Completely unnecessary. AndreyKva ( talk) 07:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Completely valid dab with multiple entries called Tomb raider which would not fit in a single hatnote. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 19:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Which are all mentioned in Tomb Raider and therefore do not require a hatnote. The only thing that should be in the hatnote is Grave robbery, otherwise everything else is unnecessary. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 13:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply
    • Just because they are mentioned on Tomb Raider doesn't mean that it's easy to find those links, especially since they're split into multiple different sections. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 21:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC) reply
      • It is quite easy, they are all either listed in Tomb Raider#Games or Tomb Raider#In other media. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 15:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. This does appear to be a valid (and useful) dab page. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 14:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep Doesn't seem like the most "needed" thing but I think it does pull everything together nicely. ALH ( talk) 08:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • I fully admit that this is pretty much an WP:ILIKEIT argument, so take that as you will. ALH ( talk) 09:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm ( talk) 17:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm ( talk) 17:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the Caribbean (disambiguation). The primary topic is the franchise, which includes every other entry listed in the disambiguation. Since there is no other separate topic to disambiguate (except maybe Grave robbery), there is no need for a disambiguation. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete if there were more articles outside of the series, then it would be useful. But as the main article is the series article (And not maybe Tomb Raider (1996 video game)), it seems pointless. Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 09:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - per nomination and Tavix's rationales. Additionally, most keep votes seem rooted in WP:ILIKEIT and WP:ITSUSEFUL. Sergecross73 msg me 20:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.