The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Sole quality source is the Evening Standard. Nothing else located on a search, same as the talk page message left by the person who tagged this for notability earlier this year. Single source is not enough to retain the article. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 09:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep subject seems to meet
WP:BASIC. In addition to what's in the article including Evening Standard, there's decent of coverage in FT including this
[1], which has both an interview and secondary coverage . Lots of other short mentions of the subject in FT. If no consensus to keep, redirect to
Simba Sleep which makes mention of the subject. —
siroχo 03:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 08:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 08:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: Not even close to
WP:N. I have to wonder how this got created in the first place, it must have fallen through cracks.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.