The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Tito Ovia

Tito Ovia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources thus doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG. She is the daughter of a prominent person but per not inherited, that doesn’t count for much. Furthermore, making it to the Forbes list doesn’t make one notable. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith ( talk) 04:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith ( talk) 04:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom -- Devokewater (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.