- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 23:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Timothy Ihemadu
- Timothy Ihemadu ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Quite questionably notable and improvable as the best my searches found were only passing mentions at Books, News and browsers enough to even suggest what I would've found continuing to search deeper. I was actually PRODing this with "Notability and improvement questionably enough for PROD as my searches found nothing better than passing mentions at Books, News and browsers." until I noticed both the September 2006 and March 2007 PRODs so here we are. Notifying first and only still active user PRODer RJFJR and Nigerian user Wikicology for insight. SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. In spite of the credible claim of significance, I don't see him passing the basic criteria. He has not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources required to merit a stand-alone article on Wikipedia. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 21:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Although there's a valid potential claim of notability here, none of Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines can ever be passed just by asserting a claim of notability if the quality of reliable sourcing available to support the claim isn't there. Sometimes it's just WP:TOOSOON. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if better sources ever start panning out. Bearcat ( talk) 23:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.