The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JForget 01:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Long article which implies notability, but few g-hits.
Mr. Vernon (
talk) 05:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom and no GNEWS or references to groups mentioned in article.
ttonyb1 (
talk) 15:31, 2 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete lets finish this off once and for all, its obviously not ever going to become notable enough to stay.
JBsupreme (
talk) 00:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
delete no references, let's wrap this one up. --
BsayUSDCSU[ π ] 01:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.