The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --
MCB 03:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Redirect it's not crystal ballery so far as the content is concerned, but it does violate
WP:NOT#PLOT. Since it provides a brief timeline, I suggest it gets redirected to
Command & Conquer (series)#Story arc, since that particular section is more or less the same.--
Alasdair 08:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
It's crystal since it's not properly sourced. Besides, the subject in itself is controversial since there is a lot of devided opinion in the C&C-community about how the timeline of the Red Alert and Tiberian series hang together. --
MrStalkertalk 08:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
I thought
WP:CRYSTAL only applied to uncertain future events. Although I could just say it's unsourced. Having played the games, the content is correct, but the exact years aren't verified. So, it is a bit like
original research.--
Alasdair 08:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Perhaps, I don't know exactly 100% what applies to what. But it is unsourced alright. --
MrStalkertalk 09:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Yup, being OR already qualifies it for deletion, or redirect to the relevant article.--
Alasdair 11:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete' This is really a plot summary, trying to document what happened over the course of C&C games
Corpx 04:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. WP:NOT#PLOT indeed. I don't see a reason for a redirect either. --
Darkwind (
talk) 19:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.