The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 04:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
This article should be deleted as it fails
WP:NFILM by not having sources independent from the subject.
KAP03 (
talk) 22:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)reply
It's a
notable PBS documentary series, it looks like. A multi-year multi-film kinda thing. We don't delete non-BLP articles merely for being unreferenced. The article's in very poor shape but it's a start. I'd say improve or at least tag for improvement, categorize, and keep per
WP:PRESERVE, which suggests we fix fixable problems.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 02:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep to be sure, it needs work. However, deletion is not the appropriate solution for an article on a notable topic.
Lepricavark (
talk) 16:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Substantial reviews in The New York Times and Los Angeles Times. Aired nationally on PBS. It's a TV documentary series, so
WP:TVSERIES may be a better fit than
WP:NFILM, but I believe it meets both. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 06:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.