The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 19:36, 4 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Pronotion for non
notable blogger. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Looking at the current sourcing, 1, press release. 2, by her. 3, doesn't mention her. 4, a picture. 5, by her. 6, a blog about blogs
[1], not rs, gives her one whole sentence. 7, primary, shows her working. 8, FashionWeekDaily
[2] gives her a whole sentence. 9, a bunch of images of unidentified models. 10 dead (
[3] covers the same show?). 11, video is gone but picture shows it was an interview, title of source says PR. 12, does not mention her. A search found nothing good for GNG. She has not done anything particularly noteworthy. Walked some fashion shows. Was a reporter. Blogged. Launched a website (copyright 2023). May have been an extra on TV (nothing on imdb). Nothing says notable.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 11:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Just Chilling (
talk) 13:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete honestly I’m not sure what specific norms and precedents we’d apply to an article of this type but the sources look like trivia to me. If there’s some policy to say they’re reliable independent sources I’m happy to be contradicted.
Mccapra (
talk) 22:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per an excellent analysis of the sources. The best I was able to find was a biography on a website she is or was an author of
[4]. But as a
WP:PRIMARY, it does not establish notability, and so she fails
WP:BASIC for the lack of SIGCOV in multiple reliable sources.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk) 07:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.