- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit (blether) 13:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Thomsen Diagrams
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thomsen Diagrams ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a WP:NEOLOGISM. "Thomsen diagram" gets 2 hits on Google Scholar; "Thomsen diagrams" gets 1. Bringing this to AfD because I also can't make head or tail of the dense, technical prose—perhaps there's something in here I haven't grasped. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Per WP:NNN. The concept does not appear to be used outside of a small handful of academic papers. - MrX 🖋 12:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Per WP:NNN. A search of the Web of Science found only one paper mentioning this concept. Apparently, it is not widely used in material sceince research. Paul H. ( talk) 02:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.