The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Most of the citations are profiles and interviews. Unable to locate significant coverage. Fails notability
DavidEfraim (
talk) 13:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE.
✗plicit 05:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment. That is a mischaracterization of Tom Lee. He is a full-time analyst on CNBC, covering the stock market in general, not just bitcoin.
Jacona (
talk) 17:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Among other things, he's been featured on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. —
Jacona (
talk) 17:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Handmeanotherbagofthemchips, it would help if you did some research first beyond just looking at the current article. Even more helpful would be if you looked for some sources to support article claims. LizRead!Talk! 05:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I still stand by my vote, @
Liz. Being just an analyst, even in such a organisation, is not automatic notability. If there is extensive coverage on himself, then I’d happily change my vote.
Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (
talk) 16:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Part of participating in an AFD is doing that research yourself, Handmeanotherbagofthemchips. Look closely at the sources in the article, investigate online sources yourself. Don't base your opinions by just reading the nomination statement and agreeing or disagreeing with it. If you want your opinion to be considered by a closer, and not disregarded, do your homework on each AFD you participate in. Bring more than just a "Keep", "Delete" or "Fails GNG" to the conversation. Become a contributor. LizRead!Talk! 05:38, 4 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 14:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment not finding notable sources as a journalist, otherwise I'm not seeing notability either.
Oaktree b (
talk) 14:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Normally I would agree an analyst is not notable, but Lee has had three Wall Street Journal articles about him over the past couple decades. One in 2002 about his work as a JP Morgan analyst and a controversial report he released about Nextel (1,000-ish words), one in 2014 when he left JP Morgan covering his work as an analyst (around 500 words) and one in 2021 post-JP Morgan regarding his market prediction during COVID and overall reputation. The latter being the weakest as it is short but still contains a couple or so independent paragraphs about him (about 300 words after removing quotes). In addition, he received in-depth coverage by CNN also related to his controversial COVID prediction. If folks do not have access to WSJ, happy to provide more details; just ping me. For transparency, I was the AfC reviewer that accepted the article.
S0091 (
talk) 19:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: I completely agree with the above statements by @
S0091 As the content creator for Tom Lee (analyst) page, there are many articles that were listed citing many independent sources that proves Tom Lee's notability.
Lee is currently a full time weekly CNBC contributor on CNBC HalfTime, Tech Check, Fast Money, and Closing Bell Overtime and appears in many other reliable sources such as:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.