The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. → Call meHahc21 01:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KTC (
talk) 22:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep -- AS the person running the publicly open Holkham Hall and its estate, I think he is notable.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. I think I'm coming down on the side of keeping articles on peers or their heirs, whether or not they sit in the House of Lords, as all their predecessors did (and therefore all meet
WP:POLITICIAN) and it would be slightly odd and not of value to the project to break the chain of Wikipedia articles. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.