From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dundurn Press. Sandstein 09:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Thomas Allen & Son Limited

Thomas Allen & Son Limited (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT BonkHindrance ( talk) 13:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. BonkHindrance ( talk) 13:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. BonkHindrance ( talk) 13:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BonkHindrance ( talk) 13:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • i'm not sure how notable the organisation is in its present form, but as a publisher it was certainly notable, and the article should deal with both. Rathfelder ( talk) 14:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, notability is not established in this case. PK T(alk) 13:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, the publisher Thomas Allen & Son is undeniably notable, & Dundurn Press is notable. Howabout we take the parts worth saving & add them to those 2 articles & rearrange the content so we don't even need to replace what was here with a redirect? -- llywrch ( talk) 07:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.