The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 01:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete; I think it's fairly clear that when basically all fields of the infobox are "TBA" there's a
WP:CRYSTAL problem (as well as
unestablished notability). —
Coren(talk) 02:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete: Only for the sole reason that it is
not notable and we can't
predict... would like to see this back eventually, though. -
Kneel17 03:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep Dont those IGN articles talk about the game? I think info is available due to their appearance at E3
Corpx 05:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. Its not notable at all. (
Woggy 06:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC))reply
'Delete Definitely fails
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:N No prejudice to recreation if notability can later be established.
Rackabello 07:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - and recreate once it appears (looking at
Duke Nukem Forever this can take a while..) and notability can be established with independent reliable sources. --
Allefant 13:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.