The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. It took a while, but I found reviews to show notability. I don't think that the individual stories merit articles, though.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Has enough reviews to be notable. There's also some coverage of Forsyth's then-unusual decision to publish his work online first. The individual stories get a bit of coverage each, but none is really notable.
Colapeninsula (
talk) 13:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep - Frederick Forsyth is one of the best-selling authors of all time (sold more than 70 million books) and this book received more than sufficient coverage
—МандичкаYO 😜 18:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep as per the others. Forsyth is tremendously prolific, and the collection does seem to meet GNG.
Vanamonde93 (
talk) 04:54, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.