The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 01:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Rehash of draft constitution proposed by a 2016 presidential candidate. It's a subtle promo for his campaign, probably too subtle for G11, but promotional nonetheless.
Bazj (
talk) 23:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Valentine (philosopher) by the same author clarifies the link to the political campaign.
Bazj (
talk) 23:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - spectacularly non-notable. Not a single hit on any of the search engines (except his own website).
Onel5969TT me 15:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete – article makes it seem like this is an actual constitution, which can be rewritten yet would still be a resounding non-notable creation of a non-notable fringe candidate.--
☾Loriendrew☽☏(ring-ring) 22:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.