From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 07:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The Trench (novel)

The Trench (novel) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 14:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. Per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE and WP:R, this page is ineligible for deletion because it could be merged and redirected to the author of this book, Steve Alten, whose notability the nominator does not question. Furthermore, a search for "Steve Alten"+meg in GNews brings up coverage in more than 320 sources, suggesting that this series of books is most probably notable. Apparently, there is going to be a film of these books with Jason Statham in it. I am under the impression he is fairly well known. A claim that there is "no coverage in reliable sources" certainly needs a great deal of further explanation when there are obviously hundreds of news sources. I also note that most of the cites to book reviews etc were recently deleted from Alten's article for no good reason that I can see. James500 ( talk) 07:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The sources found by Coolabahapple below prove that this book is indeed notable. James500 ( talk) 03:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, meets WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Reviewed by Kirkus - "Not exactly taxing on the intellectual side, but a nail-biting summer read." ( [1]), Publishers Weekly - "So how bad is this spawn of Meg, which Doubleday declined to publish (albeit perhaps in an earlier version)? About as bad--and as good--as its predecessor." ( [2]), Booklist - "Alten's follow-up of Meg (1997) is a fast-paced thriller with many plot twists.", Library Journal - "Nearly a carbon-copy of Meg, this action-packed technothriller reads like a movie script and won't provoke many thoughts but will satisfy fans of Meg and Peter Benchley.", Voice of Youth Advocates - "The Trench is recommended for readers who want non-stop suspenseful action, and who can also suspend a sense of disbelief. " ( reviews here). Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, refs in this afd satisfy wp:v. Szzuk ( talk) 07:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.