- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow close/speedy delete. I'm snow closing this because I can't see this ending other way and also because it's a clear copyvio from here. Given that there was such a problem with socking, I'm salting the page for the book and the author. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
The Theory of Creator
- The Theory of Creator ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book. As far as I can tell, it has received no coverage whatsoever. Kolbasz ( talk) 11:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Kolbasz ( talk) 11:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. I cannot find any sources that indicate the notability of this book whatsoever. For that matter, I cannot find anything notable about the author either. An argument can be made for speedily deleting both articles. -- Scjessey ( talk) 17:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- (
edit conflict)
Comment: The AfD template has now been removed from the page 4 times5 times. The page and related talk page are being 'interefered with' (blanking and 'fake' protection templates) by about 3 SPA editors (including the page creator) and one IP. FYI. 220 of Borg 17:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC) updated 220 of Borg 17:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)- FYI re the SPAs: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Surbhipatel. Kolbasz ( talk) 17:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and salt, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, a search has revealed nothing, article references are to publisher, a case of WP:PROMOTION? ditto for author article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 17:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.