The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Geschichte (
talk) 07:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)reply
A fairly short-lived vocational school that did not appear to have any notability. The only sources currently being used in the article are all from its now-defunct official website. Searching for secondary sources does not turn up much coverage. There are a handful of articles mentioning its closure, but even those have very little information on this school in specific, as most of them are on the financial woes of its parent organization in general. Overall, I am not finding enough in reliable sources that would allow this to pass either the
WP:GNG or
WP:ORG.
Rorshacma (
talk) 00:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete As Spiderone says, there's only
WP:ROUTINE coverage of this. Which isn't surprising since it seems to have only been around for like 5 years. All the news coverage on it seems to be about it's closing. Which doesn't pass either
WP:GNG or
WP:NORG]. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 04:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I think Rorshacma probably found
this on the closure - if there's an article discussing studio schools in the UK I would almost suggest a merge there, but there's nothing to merge in the article.
SportingFlyerT·C 22:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.