- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. A7 Ronhjones (Talk) 01:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The Plug Records
- The Plug Records ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not satisfy musical notability or corporate notability. Google search finds no third-party hits, only the obvious vanity hits. Robert McClenon ( talk) 01:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously promotional material from a guy who's trying to start a label with a bunch of acts that don't meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 ( talk) 17:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable label created by non-notable people with non-notable acts, and obviously promotional besides. TimothyJosephWood 20:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.