From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Doug Guetzloe. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The Phoenix Network

The Phoenix Network (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Guetzloe is notable, this network of his appears not to be.

Most of the references are either unreliable, primary, not actually about the network, or point to totally unrelated articles.

The meat of article seems to focus on Guetzloe and a weird section about a fund for a missing person that seems to have no relation to anything. Ridernyc ( talk) 22:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 01:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 01:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and redirect to Doug Guetzloe, it's entirely unclear there's anything here worth saving - David Gerard ( talk) 09:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Any radio show that's syndicated at all will, by definition, always have its own ad hoc "network" of stations that carry it, because that's what syndication is — but that fact doesn't confer an automatic presumption of notability on that "network" per WP:NMEDIA. The sources here support Guetzloe's notability as an individual, but most of them completely fail to even glancingly mention the existence of "The Phoenix Network" at all — and the one non-primary source that does mention it is a WordPress blog, not a reliable source. None of this is remotely enough to make The Phoenix Network independently notable as a standalone topic. Redirect to Doug Guetzloe. Bearcat ( talk) 01:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect (after delete) to Doug Guetzloe. Not independently notable. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.