- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 20:24, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
The Matriarch Agency
- The Matriarch Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about non-notable agency (with possible COI problems). Google searches came up almost empty, just a few passing mentions. GermanJoe ( talk) 19:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A good PROD candidate. CorporateM ( Talk) 02:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A management company, and a small one without notability. Hithladaeus ( talk) 12:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - All my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found no immediate good sources and this isn't surprising for a company that was founded recently in 2009. SwisterTwister talk 04:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.