The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 01:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Lack of significant coverage in secondary sources. The existing sources maybe reliable but they're nothing more than passing mentions. Just the "They said this, they said that" type of sources. - TheMagnificentist 16:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - spammy article about his organization. Username was blocked for being the organization. Was changed to someone at the org, and back to advertising. Serious COI, sources are mostly their own website. --
Alexf(talk) 14:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 02:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.