- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 22:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
The Flower Under Dark Shadow
- The Flower Under Dark Shadow ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The film appears to fail the notability requirements of WP:FILM. Pichpich ( talk) 01:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete Film was release two weeks ago, and so far... no coverage. Fails WP:NF. If it does gain requisite coverage, the article can be undeleted. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfortunately there just isn't any coverage out there for this film. There may be coverage in another language, but the lack of non-primary English language sources suggests that there is not at this time. Like Schmidt said, we can always re-create it when/if more coverage becomes available. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:51, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep there are references about the films. and film is also a low budget short film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dv navi ( talk • contribs) 18:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC) — Dv navi ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- @ Dv navi: The issue is not about a low budget nor about whether or not the article is sourced. The concern is whether or not its current sourcing is suitable to show requisite notability. Blog postings by filmmaker Gabbar Punjabi himself [1] [2] do not, nor do the 30-second and 60-second promo clips he posted to YouTube. Please study WP:RS. Thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 19:48, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.