The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hopelessly promotional article created out of brief mentions, quotes, directories and primary sources. Even if two in-depth profiles stories existed to pass
WP:CORP, any volunteer that has an interest in the subject would be better off starting from scratch. It is possible the founder may qualify for a page, which is a discussion for another time.
CorporateM (
Talk) 04:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep The coverage is sufficient, and of sufficient quality, to meet
WP:GNG. Problems with the article should not be dealt with through AfD. --
MelanieN (
talk) 04:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.