- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 07:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
The Anglican Planet
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Anglican Planet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to be a notable publication. Only found one or two throwaway mentions of it in independent sources. Dronebogus ( talk) 00:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 00:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Magazine is not notable. TH1980 ( talk) 02:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Question -- What is is circulation? Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It is time we started deleting every article that is sourced only to the subject's own website. We need to stop allowing articles to come into being that do not have any independent sources. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.